Paper detail

Estimating the effects of sea level rise on coupled estuarine nitrogen cycling processes through comparative network analysis

Nitrogen (N) removal from estuaries is driven in part by sedimentary microbial processes. The processes of denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) remove N from estuaries by producing di-nitrogen gas, and each can be coupled to N recycling pathways such as nitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA). Environmental conditions in estuaries influence sedimentary N cycling processes; therefore, seawater intrusion may affect the coupling of N cycling processes in the freshwater portions of estuaries. This study investigated the potential effects of seawater intrusion on these process couplings through a comparative modeling approach. We applied environ analysis, a form of ecological network analysis, to two N cycling mass-balance network models constructed at freshwater (oligohaline) and saltwater (polyhaline) sites in the Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina. We used a space-for-time substitution to predict the effects of seawater intrusion on the sedimentary N cycle. Further, we conducted an uncertainty analysis using linear inverse modeling to evaluate the effects of parameterization uncertainty on model results. Nitrification coupled to both denitrification and anammox was 2.5 times greater in the oligohaline model, while DNRA coupled to anammox was 2.7 times greater in the polyhaline model. However, the total amount of N2 gas produced relative to the nitrogen inputs to each network was 4.7% and 4.6% at the oligohaline and polyhaline sites, respectively. These findings suggest that changes in water chemistry from seawater intrusion may favor direct over coupled nitrogen removal, but may not substantially change the N removal capacity of the sedimentary microbial processes.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.