Paper detail

Estimating Mutual Information via Geodesic $k$NN

Estimating mutual information (MI) between two continuous random variables $X$ and $Y$ allows to capture non-linear dependencies between them, non-parametrically. As such, MI estimation lies at the core of many data science applications. Yet, robustly estimating MI for high-dimensional $X$ and $Y$ is still an open research question. In this paper, we formulate this problem through the lens of manifold learning. That is, we leverage the common assumption that the information of $X$ and $Y$ is captured by a low-dimensional manifold embedded in the observed high-dimensional space and transfer it to MI estimation. As an extension to state-of-the-art $k$NN estimators, we propose to determine the $k$-nearest neighbors via geodesic distances on this manifold rather than from the ambient space, which allows us to estimate MI even in the high-dimensional setting. An empirical evaluation of our method, G-KSG, against the state-of-the-art shows that it yields good estimations of MI in classical benchmark and manifold tasks, even for high dimensional datasets, which none of the existing methods can provide.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.