Paper detail

Estimating masses of dwarf spheroidal galaxies

Precise measurements of mass in dark matter dominated dwarf spheroidal galaxies are of great importance for testing the theories of structure formation. We use $N$-body simulations of the tidal evolution of a dwarf galaxy orbiting the Milky Way to generate mock kinematical data sets and use them to test the reliability of a simple mass estimator proposed by Wolf et al. The evolution of the initially disky dwarf galaxy embedded in a dark matter halo was traced for 10 Gyr on a rather tight orbit. After about half of the time a dwarf spheroidal galaxy is formed that retains some remnant rotation and a non-spherical shape. Observing the triaxial galaxy along each of its principal axes we measure its half-light radius and the line-of-sight velocity dispersion and use them to estimate the mass. We find that the mass is significantly overestimated when the dwarf is seen along the longest axis of the stellar component and underestimated when observed along the shortest axis. We provide a formula that quantifies the systematic error in the estimated mass with respect to the true one as a function of the galaxy shape and line of sight.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.