Paper detail

Estimating linear radiance indicators from the zenith night sky brightness: on the Posch ratio for natural and light polluted skies

Estimating the horizontal irradiance from measurements of the zenith night sky radiance is a useful operation for basic and applied studies in observatory site assessment, atmospheric optics and environmental sciences. The ratio between these two quantities, also known as Posch ratio, has been previously studied for some canonical cases and reported for a few observational sites. In this work we (a) generalize the Posch ratio concept, extending it to any pair of radiance-related linear indicators, (b) describe its main algebraic properties, and (c) provide analytical expressions and numerical evaluations for its three basic nighttime components (moonlight, starlight and other astrophysical light sources, and artificial light). We show that the horizontal irradiance (or any other linear radiance indicator) is generally correlated with the zenith radiance, enabling its estimation from zenith measurements if some a priori information on the atmospheric state is available.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.