Paper detail

Estimating eps'/eps in the standard model independently of Im λ_t

The CP-violating parameter eps'/eps is estimated in a novel way by including the explicit computation of eps in the ratio as opposed to the usual procedure of taking its value from the experiments. This approach has the advantage of being independent from the determination of the CKM parameters Im λ_t and of showing more directly the dependence on the long-distance parameters. The matrix elements are taken from the chiral quark model approach, the parameters of which have been recently determined by an updated fit of the CP-conserving amplitudes entering the ΔI=1/2 rule. By taking a normal distribution for the experimental inputs and a flat one for the theoretical uncertainties, it is found that eps '/eps = (2.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-3} in agreement with the current experimental data. A more conservative estimate 0.9 x 10^{-3} < eps'/eps < 5.8 x 10^{-3} is found by considering the smallest and the largest values obtained by taking a flat distribution for all inputs.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.