Paper detail

Estimating Black Hole Masses in Triaxial Galaxies

Most of the super massive black hole mass estimates based on stellar kinematics use the assumption that galaxies are axisymmetric oblate spheroids or spherical. Here we use fully general triaxial orbit-based models to explore the effect of relaxing the axisymmetric assumption on the previously studied galaxies M32 and NGC 3379. We find that M32 can only be modeled accurately using an axisymmetric shape viewed nearly edge-on and our black hole mass estimate is identical to previous studies. When the observed 5 degrees kinematical twist is included in our model of NGC 3379, the best shape is mildly triaxial and we find that our best-fitting black hole mass estimate doubles with respect to the axisymmetric model. This particular black hole mass estimate is still within the errors of that of the axisymmetric model and consistent with the M-sigma relationship. However, this effect may have a pronounced impact on black hole demography, since roughly a third of the most massive galaxies are strongly triaxial.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.