Paper detail

Estimating a Common Period for a Set of Irregularly Sampled Functions with Applications to Periodic Variable Star Data

We consider the estimation of a common period for a set of functions sampled at irregular intervals. The problem arises in astronomy, where the functions represent a star's brightness observed over time through different photometric filters. While current methods can estimate periods accurately provided that the brightness is well--sampled in at least one filter, there are no existing methods that can provide accurate estimates when no brightness function is well--sampled. In this paper we introduce two new methods for period estimation when brightnesses are poorly--sampled in all filters. The first, multiband generalized Lomb-Scargle (MGLS), extends the frequently used Lomb-Scargle method in a way that naïvely combines information across filters. The second, penalized generalized Lomb-Scargle (PGLS), builds on the first by more intelligently borrowing strength across filters. Specifically, we incorporate constraints on the phases and amplitudes across the different functions using a non--convex penalized likelihood function. We develop a fast algorithm to optimize the penalized likelihood by combining block coordinate descent with the majorization-minimization (MM) principle. We illustrate our methods on synthetic and real astronomy data. Both advance the state-of-the-art in period estimation; however, PGLS significantly outperforms MGLS when all functions are extremely poorly--sampled.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.