Paper detail

Estimates of the change rate of solar mass and gravitational constant based on the dynamics of the Solar System

The estimate of the change rate of the solar gravitational parameter $\mathrm{d}(GM_{\odot})/\mathrm{d}t$ is obtained from processing modern positional observations of planets and spacecraft. Observations were processed and parameters were determined basing on the numerical planetary ephemeris EPM2019. The obtained annual decrease in solar mass $M_{\odot}$ accounts for the loss through radiation ${\dot M}_{{\odot}\mathrm{rad}}$, through the outgoing solar wind ${\dot M}_{{\odot}{\mathrm{wind}}}$, and for the material falling on the Sun ${\dot M}_{{\odot}\mathrm{fall}}$. The estimated relative value is within $-13.4\cdot 10^{-14} < (\dot M_{\odot} /M_{\odot})_{\mathrm{rad}+\mathrm{wind}+ \mathrm{fall}} < -8.7\cdot 10^{-14}$ per year. The following range for the change rate of the gravitational constant $G$ was obtained: $-2.9 \cdot 10^{-14} < \dot G /G < + 4.6 \cdot 10^{-14}$ per year $(3σ$). The new result reduces the interval for the change in $G$ and narrows the limits of possible deviations for alternative gravitational theories from general relativity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.