Paper detail

Estimates of covering type and minimal triangulations based on category weight

In a recent publication (D. Govc, W. Marzantowicz, P. Pavesic, Estimates of covering type and the number of vertices of minimal triangulations, Discr. Comp. Geom. 63 (2019), 31-48) we have introduced a new method, based on the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category and the cohomology ring of a space X, that yields lower bounds for the size of a triangulation of X. In this paper we present an important extension that takes into account the fundamental group of X. In fact, if it contains elements of finite order, then one can often find cohomology classes of high 'category weight', which in turn allow for much stronger estimates of the size of triangulations of X. We develop several weighted estimates and then apply our method to compute explicit lower bounds for the size of triangulations of orbit spaces of cyclic group actions on a variety of spaces including products of spheres, Stiefel manifolds, Lie groups and highly-connected manifolds.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.