Paper detail

Estimated relations at a shock driven by a coronal mass ejection

Analysis of SOHO/LASCO C3 data reveals a discontinuity, interpreted as a shock wave, in plasma density radial profiles in a restricted region ahead of each of ten selected coronal mass ejections (CME) along their travel directions. In various events, shock wave velocity $V\approx$ 800-2500 km s$^{-1}$. Comparing the dependence of Alfvén Mach number $M_A$ on shock wave strength $ρ_2/ρ_1$, measured at $R > 10R_\odot$ from the center of the Sun, to ideal MHD calculations suggests that the effective adiabatic index $γ$, characterizing the processes inside the shock front, is largely between 2 and 5/3. This corresponds to the effective number of degrees of freedom of motion 2 to 3. A similar dependence, $M_A(ρ_2/ρ_1)$, was derived for the Earth's bow shock and interplanetary collisionless shock waves. All this supports the assumption that the discontinuities in front of CMEs are collisionless shock waves.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.