Paper detail

Estimate Metabolite Taxonomy and Structure with a Fragment-Centered Database and Fragment Network

Metabolite structure identification has become the major bottleneck of the mass spectrometry based metabolomics research. Till now, number of mass spectra databases and search algorithms have been developed to address this issue. However, two critical problems still exist: the low chemical component record coverage in databases and significant MS/MS spectra variations related to experiment equipment and parameter settings. In this work, we considered the molecule fragment as basic building blocks of the metabolic components which had relatively consistent signatures in MS/MS spectra. And from a bottom-up point of view, we built a fragment centered database, MSFragDB, by reorganizing the data from the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) and developed an intensity-free searching algorithm to search and rank the most relative metabolite according to the users' input. We also proposed the concept of fragment network, a graph structure that encoded the relationship between the molecule fragments to find close motif that indicated a specific chemical structure. Although based on the same dataset as the HMDB, validation results implied that the MSFragDB had a higher hit ratio and furthermore, estimated possible taxonomy that a query spectrum belongs to when the corresponding chemical component was missing in the database. Aid by the Fragment Network, the MSFragDB was also proved to be able to estimate the right structure while the MS/MS spectrum suffers from the precursor-contamination. The strategy proposed is general and can be adopted in existing databases. We believe MSFragDB and Fragment Network can improve the performance of structure identification with existing data. The beta version of the database is freely available at www.xrzhanglab.com/msfragdb/.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.