Paper detail

Essential physics of early galaxy formation

We present a theoretical model embedding the essential physics of early galaxy formation (z = 5-12) based on the single premise that any galaxy can form stars with a maximal limiting efficiency that provides enough energy to expel all the remaining gas, quenching further star formation. This simple idea is implemented into a merger-tree based semi-analytical model that utilises two mass and redshift-independent parameters to capture the key physics of supernova feedback in ejecting gas from low-mass halos, and tracks the resulting impact on the subsequent growth of more massive systems via halo mergers and gas accretion. Our model shows that: (i) the smallest halos (halo mass $M_h \leq 10^{10} M_\odot$) build up their gas mass by accretion from the intergalactic medium; (ii) the bulk of the gas powering star formation in larger halos ($M_h \geq 10^{11.5} M_\odot$) is brought in by merging progenitors; (iii) the faint-end UV luminosity function slope evolves according to $α= -1.75 \log \,z -0.52$. In addition, (iv) the stellar mass-to-light ratio is well fit by the functional form $\log\, M_* = -0.38 M_{UV} -0.13\, z + 2.4$, which we use to build the evolving stellar mass function to compare to observations. We end with a census of the cosmic stellar mass density (SMD) across galaxies with UV magnitudes over the range $-23 \leq M_{UV} \leq -11$ spanning redshifts $5 < z < 12$: (v) while currently detected LBGs contain $\approx 50$% (10%) of the total SMD at $z=5$ (8), the JWST will detect up to 25% of the SMD at $z \simeq 9.5$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.