Paper detail

Essential Characteristics of Approximate matching algorithms: A Survey of Practitioners Opinions and requirement regarding Approximate Matching

Digital forensic investigation has become more challenging due to the rapid growth in the volume of encountered data. It is difficult for an investigator to examine the entire volume of encountered data manually. Approximate Matching algorithms are being used to serve the purpose by automatically filtering correlated and relevant data that an investigator needs to examine manually. Presently there are several prominent approximate matching tools and technique those are being used to assist critical investigation process. However, to measure the guarantees of a tool, it is important to understand the exact requirement of an investigator regarding these algorithms. This paper presents the findings of a closed survey conducted among a highly experienced group of federal state and local law enforcement practitioners and researchers, aimed to understand the practitioner and researcher's opinion regarding approximate matching algorithms. The study provides the baseline attributes of approximate matching tools that a scheme should possess to meet the real requirement of an investigator.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.