Abstract
We examine whether large language models (LLMs) hold systematic beliefs about environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues and how these beliefs compare with-and potentially influence-those of human market participants. Based on established surveys originally administered to professional and retail investors, we show that major LLMs exhibit a strong pro-ESG orientation. Compared with human investors, LLMs assign greater financial relevance for ESG performance, expect larger return premia for high-ESG firms, and display a stronger willingness to sacrifice financial returns for ESG improvements. These preferences are highly uniform and values-driven, in contrast to heterogeneous human views. Using a large dataset of analyst reports, we further show that sell-side analysts become significantly more optimistic about high-ESG firms after adopting LLMs for research. Our findings reveal that LLMs embed distinct, coherent ESG beliefs and that these beliefs can shape human judgments, highlighting a new channel through which AI adoption may influence financial markets.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.