Paper detail

Escaping the Densification Plateau in Cellular Networks Through mmWave Beamforming

We study how dense multi-antenna millimeter wave (mmWave) cellular network performance scales in terms of the base station (BS) spatial density $λ$, by studying the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) and the area spectral efficiency (ASE). If the number of antennas at each BS scales at least linearly with $λ$, which increases the number of possible beam configurations and their main-lobe gain, and decreases their side-lobe gain, we prove that the SINR approaches a finite random variable that is independent of $λ$ and the ASE scales at least linearly with $λ$. In contrast, if the number of antennas scales sub-linearly with $λ$, then the SINR decays to zero and the ASE saturates to a constant. Thus, by moving to higher carrier frequencies with successively smaller antennas, and exploiting the correspondingly increased directionality, cellular operators can in principle avoid the densification plateau (or collapse) in cellular networks and instead continue to harvest linear sum throughput gains through BS densification.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.