Paper detail

Escaping particle fluxes in the atmospheres of close-in exoplanets. ii. reduced mass loss rates and anisotropic winds

We constructed a multi-fluid two-dimensional hydrodynamic model with detailed radiative transfer to depict the escape of particles. We found that the tidal forces supply significant accelerations and result in anisotropic winds. An important effect of the tidal forces is that it severely depresses the outflow of particles near the polar regions. As a consequence, most particles escape the surface of the planet from the regions of low-latitude. Comparing the tidal and non-tidal locking cases, we found that their optical depths are very different so that the flows also emerge with a different pattern. In the case of the non-tidal locking, the radial velocities at the base of the wind are higher than the meridional velocities. However, in the case of tidal locking, the meridional velocities dominate the flow at the base of the wind, and they can transfer effectively mass and energy from the day sides to the night sides. Further, we also found that the differences of the winds show middle extent at large radii. It expresses that the structure of the wind at the base can be changed by the two-dimensional radiative transfer due to large optical depths, but the extent is reduced with an increase in radius. Because the escape is depressed in the polar regions, the mass loss rate predicted by the non-tidal locking model, in the order of magnitude of $10^{10}$ g s$^{-1}$, is a factor of 2 lower than that predicted by one-dimensional hydrodynamic model. The results of tidal locking show that the mass loss rate is decreased a order of magnitude, only 4.3$\times$ $10^{9}$ g s$^{-1}$, due to large optical depths on the night side. We also found that the distributions of hydrogen atoms show clear variations from the day side to night side, thus the origin of the excess absorption in Ly $α$ should be reexamined by using multi-dimensional hydrodynamic models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.