Paper detail

Eruption of the Envelope of Massive Stars by Energy Injection with Finite Duration

A significant fraction of supernovae show signatures of dense circumstellar material (CSM). While multiple scenarios for creating a dense CSM exist, mass eruption due to injection of energy at the base of the outer envelope is a likely possibility. We carry out radiation hydrodynamical simulations of eruptive mass loss from a typical red supergiant progenitor with initial mass of $15\ M_\odot$, for the first time focusing on the timescale of the injection as well as energy. We find that not only sufficient injection energy but also sufficient rate of energy injection per unit time, $L_{\rm{min}} \sim 8\times 10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in this particular model, is required for eruption of unbound CSM. This result suggests that the energy injection rate needs to be greater than the binding energy of the envelope divided by the dynamical timescale for the eruption. The density profile of the resulting CSM, whose shape was analytically and numerically predicted in the limit of instantaneous energy injection, similarly holds for a finite injection timescale. We discuss our findings in the framework of proposed mass outburst scenarios, specifically wave-driven outbursts and common envelope ejection.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.