Paper detail

Error-run-time trade-off in the adiabatic approximation beyond scaling relations

The use of the adiabatic approximation in practical applications, as in adiabatic quantum computation, demands an assessment of the errors made in finite-time evolutions. Aiming at such scenarios, we derive bounds relating error and evolution time in the adiabatic approximation that go beyond typical scaling relations. Using the Adiabatic Perturbation Theory, we obtain leading-order expressions valid for long evolution time $T$, while explicitly determining the shortest time $T$ and the largest error $\varepsilon$ for which they are valid. In this validity regime, we can make clear and precise statements about the evolution time needed to reach a given error and vice-versa. As an example of practical importance, we apply these results to the adiabatic search, and obtain for the first time an error-run-time trade-off relation that fully reproduces the discrete-Grover-search scaling. We also pioneer the obtention of tight numerical values for $\varepsilon$ and $T$ under the error-reducing strategy ``boundary cancelation''.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.