Paper detail

Error Probability Bounds for Coded-Index DNA Storage

The DNA storage channel is considered, in which a codeword is comprised of $M$ unordered DNA molecules. At reading time, $N$ molecules are sampled with replacement, and then each molecule is sequenced. A coded-index concatenated-coding scheme is considered, in which the $m$th molecule of the codeword is restricted to a subset of all possible molecules (an inner code), which is unique for each $m$. The decoder has low-complexity, and is based on first decoding each molecule separately (the inner code), and then decoding the sequence of molecules (an outer code). Only mild assumptions are made on the sequencing channel, in the form of the existence of an inner code and decoder with vanishing error. The error probability of a random code as well as an expurgated code is analyzed and shown to decay exponentially with $N$. This establishes the importance of increasing the coverage depth $N/M$ in order to obtain low error probability.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.