Paper detail

Error Exponent for Multiple-Access Channels:Lower Bounds

A unified framework to obtain all known lower bounds (random coding, typical random coding and expurgated bound) on the reliability function of a point-to-point discrete memoryless channel (DMC) is presented. By using a similar idea for a two-user discrete memoryless (DM) multiple-access channel (MAC), three lower bounds on the reliability function are derived. The first one (random coding) is identical to the best known lower bound on the reliability function of DM-MAC. It is shown that the random coding bound is the performance of the average code in the constant composition code ensemble. The second bound (Typical random coding) is the typical performance of the constant composition code ensemble. To derive the third bound (expurgated), we eliminate some of the codewords from the codebook with larger rate. This is the first bound of this type that explicitly uses the method of expurgation for MACs. It is shown that the exponent of the typical random coding and the expurgated bounds are greater than or equal to the exponent of the known random coding bounds for all rate pairs. Moreover, an example is given where the exponent of the expurgated bound is strictly larger. All these bounds can be universally obtained for all discrete memoryless MACs with given input and output alphabets.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.