Paper detail

Error estimates of stable and stabilized Lagrange-Galerkin schemes for natural convection problems

Optimal error estimates of stable and stabilized Lagrange-Galerkin (LG) schemes for natural convection problems are proved under a mild condition on time increment and mesh size. The schemes maintain the common advantages of the LG method, i.e., robustness for convection-dominated problems and symmetry of the coefficient matrix of the system of linear equations. We simply consider typical two sets of finite elements for the velocity, pressure and temperature, P2/P1/P2 and P1/P1/P1, which are employed by the stable and stabilized LG schemes, respectively. The stabilized LG scheme has an additional advantage, a small number of degrees of freedom especially for three-dimensional problems. The proof of the optimal error estimates is done by extending the arguments of the proofs of error estimates of stable and stabilized LG schemes for the Navier-Stokes equations in previous literature.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.