Paper detail

Error Decay of (almost) Consistent Signal Estimations from Quantized Gaussian Random Projections

This paper provides new error bounds on "consistent" reconstruction methods for signals observed from quantized random projections. Those signal estimation techniques guarantee a perfect matching between the available quantized data and a new observation of the estimated signal under the same sensing model. Focusing on dithered uniform scalar quantization of resolution $δ>0$, we prove first that, given a Gaussian random frame of $\mathbb R^N$ with $M$ vectors, the worst-case $\ell_2$-error of consistent signal reconstruction decays with high probability as $O(\frac{N}{M}\log\frac{M}{\sqrt N})$ uniformly for all signals of the unit ball $\mathbb B^N \subset \mathbb R^N$. Up to a log factor, this matches a known lower bound in $Ω(N/M)$ and former empirical validations in $O(N/M)$. Equivalently, if $M$ exceeds a minimal number of frame coefficients growing like $O(\frac{N}{ε_0}\log \frac{\sqrt N}{ε_0})$, any vectors in $\mathbb B^N$ with $M$ identical quantized projections are at most $ε_0$ apart with high probability. Second, in the context of Quantized Compressed Sensing with $M$ Gaussian random measurements and under the same scalar quantization scheme, consistent reconstructions of $K$-sparse signals of $\mathbb R^N$ have a worst-case error that decreases with high probability as $O(\tfrac{K}{M}\log\tfrac{MN}{\sqrt K^3})$ uniformly for all such signals. Finally, we show that the proximity of vectors whose quantized random projections are only approximately consistent can still be bounded with high probability. A certain level of corruption is thus allowed in the quantization process, up to the appearance of a systematic bias in the reconstruction error of (almost) consistent signal estimates.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.