Error Decay of (almost) Consistent Signal Estimations from Quantized Gaussian Random Projections

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

This paper provides new error bounds on "consistent" reconstruction methods for signals observed from quantized random projections. Those signal estimation techniques guarantee a perfect matching between the available quantized data and a new observation of the estimated signal under the same sensing model. Focusing on dithered uniform scalar quantization of resolution δ>0δ>0, we prove first that, given a Gaussian random frame of RN\mathbb R^N with MM vectors, the worst-case ℓ2\ell_2-error of consistent signal reconstruction decays with high probability as O(NMlog⁡MN)O(\frac{N}{M}\log\frac{M}{\sqrt N}) uniformly for all signals of the unit ball BN⊂RN\mathbb B^N \subset \mathbb R^N. Up to a log factor, this matches a known lower bound in Ω(N/M)Ω(N/M) and former empirical validations in O(N/M)O(N/M). Equivalently, if MM exceeds a minimal number of frame coefficients growing like O(Nε0log⁡Nε0)O(\frac{N}{ε_0}\log \frac{\sqrt N}{ε_0}), any vectors in BN\mathbb B^N with MM identical quantized projections are at most ε0ε_0 apart with high probability. Second, in the context of Quantized Compressed Sensing with MM Gaussian random measurements and under the same scalar quantization scheme, consistent reconstructions of KK-sparse signals of RN\mathbb R^N have a worst-case error that decreases with high probability as O(KMlog⁡MNK3)O(\tfrac{K}{M}\log\tfrac{MN}{\sqrt K^3}) uniformly for all such signals. Finally, we show that the proximity of vectors whose quantized random projections are only approximately consistent can still be bounded with high probability. A certain level of corruption is thus allowed in the quantization process, up to the appearance of a systematic bias in the reconstruction error of (almost) consistent signal estimates.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.