Paper detail

Error bounds for consistent reconstruction: random polytopes and coverage processes

Consistent reconstruction is a method for producing an estimate $\widetilde{x} \in \mathbb{R}^d$ of a signal $x\in \mathbb{R}^d$ if one is given a collection of $N$ noisy linear measurements $q_n = \langle x, φ_n \rangle + ε_n$, $1 \leq n \leq N$, that have been corrupted by i.i.d. uniform noise $\{ε_n\}_{n=1}^N$. We prove mean squared error bounds for consistent reconstruction when the measurement vectors $\{φ_n\}_{n=1}^N\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ are drawn independently at random from a suitable distribution on the unit-sphere $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$. Our main results prove that the mean squared error (MSE) for consistent reconstruction is of the optimal order $\mathbb{E}\|x - \widetilde{x}\|^2 \leq Kδ^2/N^2$ under general conditions on the measurement vectors. We also prove refined MSE bounds when the measurement vectors are i.i.d. uniformly distributed on the unit-sphere $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ and, in particular, show that in this case the constant $K$ is dominated by $d^3$, the cube of the ambient dimension. The proofs involve an analysis of random polytopes using coverage processes on the sphere.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.