Paper detail

Error analysis of tau-leap simulation methods

We perform an error analysis for numerical approximation methods of continuous time Markov chain models commonly found in the chemistry and biochemistry literature. The motivation for the analysis is to be able to compare the accuracy of different approximation methods and, specifically, Euler tau-leaping and midpoint tau-leaping. We perform our analysis under a scaling in which the size of the time discretization is inversely proportional to some (bounded) power of the norm of the state of the system. We argue that this is a more appropriate scaling than that found in previous error analyses in which the size of the time discretization goes to zero independent of the rest of the model. Under the present scaling, we show that midpoint tau-leaping achieves a higher order of accuracy, in both a weak and a strong sense, than Euler tau-leaping; a result that is in contrast to previous analyses. We present examples that demonstrate our findings.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.