Paper detail

QCD sum rules study of the $J^{PC}=1^{--}$ charmonium $Y$ mesons

We use QCD sum rules to test the nature of the recently observed mesons Y(4260), Y(4350) and Y(4660), assumed to be exotic four-quark $(c\bar{c}q\bar{q})$ or $(c\bar{c}s\bar{s})$ states with $J^{PC}=1^{--}$. We work at leading order in $α_s$, consider the contributions of higher dimension condensates and keep terms which are linear in the strange quark mass $m_s$. We find for the $(c\bar{c}s\bar{s})$ state a mass $m_Y=(4.65\pm 0.10)$ GeV which is compatible with the experimental candidate Y(4660), while for the $(c\bar{c}q\bar{q})$ state we find a mass $m_Y=(4.49\pm 0.11)$ GeV, which is higger than the mass of the experimental candidate Y(4350). With the tetraquark structure we are working we can not explain the Y(4260) as a tetraquark state. We also consider molecular $D_{s0}\bar{D}_s^*$ and $D_{0}\bar{D}^*$ states. For the $D_{s0}\bar{D}_s^*$ molecular state we get $m_{D_{s0}\bar{D}_s^*}=(4.42\pm 0.10)$ GeV which is consistent, considering the errors, with the mass of the meson Y(4350) and for the $D_{0}\bar{D}^*$ molecular state we get $m_{D_{0}\bar{D}^*}=(4.27\pm 0.10)$ GeV in excelent agreement with the mass of the meson Y(4260).

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.