Paper detail

Erosion driven size-redistribution of protoplanetary disk solids and the onset of streaming Instability and Pebble Accretion

The formation of the first planetesimals and the final growth of planetary cores relies on the abundance of small pebbles. The efficiencies of both the streaming instability (SI) process, suggested to catalyze the early growth of planetesimals, and the pebble-accretion process, suggested to accelerate the growth of planetary cores, depend on the sizes of solids residing in the disk. In particular, these processes were found to be sensitive to size distribution of solids, and efficient planetesimal formation and growth through these channels require a limited pebble size distribution. Here we show that aeolian erosion, a process that efficiently grinds down boulders into a mono-sized distribution of pebbles, provides a natural upper limit for the maximal pebble sizes (in terms of their Stokes number). We find the dependence of this upper limit on the radial separation, disk age, turbulence strength, and the grain-size composition of the boulders in the disk. SI is favorable in areas with a Stokes number less than 0.1, which is found in the inner sub-astronomical-unit regions of the disk. This upper limit shapes the size distribution of small pebbles and thereby catalyzes the early onset of planetesimal formation due to SI, and the later core accretion growth through pebble accretion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.