Paper detail

Ergodicity analysis and antithetic integral control of a class of stochastic reaction networks with delays

Delays are an important phenomenon arising in a wide variety of real world systems. They occur in biological models because of diffusion effects or as simplifying modeling elements. We propose here to consider delayed stochastic reaction networks. The difficulty here lies in the fact that the state-space of a delayed reaction network is infinite-dimensional, which makes their analysis more involved. We demonstrate here that a particular class of stochastic time-varying delays, namely those that follow a phase-type distribution, can be exactly implemented in terms of a chemical reaction network. Hence, any delay-free network can be augmented to incorporate those delays through the addition of delay-species and delay-reactions. Hence, for this class of stochastic delays, which can be used to approximate any delay distribution arbitrarily accurately, the state-space remains finite-dimensional and, therefore, standard tools developed for standard reaction network still apply. In particular, we demonstrate that for unimolecular mass-action reaction networks that the delayed stochastic reaction network is ergodic if and only if the non-delayed network is ergodic as well. Bimolecular reactions are more difficult to consider but an analogous result is also obtained. These results tell us that delays that are phase-type distributed, regardless of their distribution, are not harmful to the ergodicity property of reaction networks. We also prove that the presence of those delays adds convolution terms in the moment equation but does not change the value of the stationary means compared to the delay-free case. Finally, the control of a certain class of delayed stochastic reaction network using a delayed antithetic integral controller is considered. It is proven that this controller achieves its goal provided that the delay-free network satisfy the conditions of ergodicity and output-controllability.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.