Paper detail

Ergodic convergence of a stochastic proximal point algorithm

The purpose of this paper is to establish the almost sure weak ergodic convergence of a sequence of iterates $(x_n)$ given by $x_{n+1} = (I+λ_n A(ξ_{n+1},\,.\,))^{-1}(x_n)$ where $(A(s,\,.\,):s\in E)$ is a collection of maximal monotone operators on a separable Hilbert space, $(ξ_n)$ is an independent identically distributed sequence of random variables on $E$ and $(λ_n)$ is a positive sequence in $\ell^2\backslash \ell^1$. The weighted averaged sequence of iterates is shown to converge weakly to a zero (assumed to exist) of the Aumann expectation ${\mathbb E}(A(ξ_1,\,.\,))$ under the assumption that the latter is maximal. We consider applications to stochastic optimization problems of the form $\min {\mathbb E}(f(ξ_1,x))$ w.r.t. $x\in \bigcap_{i=1}^m X_i$ where $f$ is a normal convex integrand and $(X_i)$ is a collection of closed convex sets. In this case, the iterations are closely related to a stochastic proximal algorithm recently proposed by Wang and Bertsekas.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.