Paper detail

Erdős-Pósa from ball packing

A classic theorem of Erdős and Pósa (1965) states that every graph has either $k$ vertex-disjoint cycles or a set of $O(k \log k)$ vertices meeting all its cycles. While the standard proof revolves around finding a large `frame' in the graph (a subdivision of a large cubic graph), an alternative way of proving this theorem is to use a ball packing argument of Kühn and Osthus (2003) and Diestel and Rempel (2005). In this paper, we argue that the latter approach is particularly well suited for studying edge variants of the Erdős-Pósa theorem. As an illustration, we give a short proof of a theorem of Bruhn, Heinlein, and Joos (2019), that cycles of length at least $\ell$ have the so-called edge-Erdős-Pósa property. More precisely, we show that every graph $G$ either contains $k$ edge-disjoint cycles of length at least $\ell$ or an edge set $F$ of size $O(k\ell \cdot \log (k\ell))$ such that $G-F$ has no cycle of length at least $\ell$. For fixed $\ell$, this improves on the previously best known bound of $O(k^2 \log k +k\ell)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.