Paper detail

Erasure Schemes Using Generalized Polar Codes: Zero-Undetected-Error Capacity and Performance Trade-offs

We study the performance of generalized polar (GP) codes when they are used for coding schemes involving erasure. GP codes are a family of codes which contains, among others, the standard polar codes of Arıkan and Reed-Muller codes. We derive a closed formula for the zero-undetected-error capacity $I_0^{GP}(W)$ of GP codes for a given binary memoryless symmetric (BMS) channel $W$ under the low complexity successive cancellation decoder with erasure. We show that for every $R<I_0^{GP}(W)$, there exists a generalized polar code of blocklength $N$ and of rate at least $R$ where the undetected-error probability is zero and the erasure probability is less than $2^{-N^{\frac{1}{2}-ε}}$. On the other hand, for any GP code of rate $I_0^{GP}(W)<R<I(W)$ and blocklength $N$, the undetected error probability cannot be made less than $2^{-N^{\frac{1}{2}+ε}}$ unless the erasure probability is close to $1$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.