Abstract

The aim of this study is to better understand the connection between the Lyman αα rest-frame equivalent width (EW0_0) and spectral properties as well as ultraviolet (UV) continuum morphology by obtaining reliable EW0_0 histograms for a statistical sample of galaxies and by assessing the fraction of objects with large equivalent widths. We used integral field spectroscopy from MUSE combined with broad-band data from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to measure EW0_0. We analysed the emission lines of 19201920 Lyman αα emitters (LAEs) detected in the full MUSE-Wide (one hour exposure time) and MUSE-Deep (ten hour exposure time) surveys and found UV continuum counterparts in archival HST data. We fitted the UV continuum photometric images using the Galfit software to gain morphological information on the rest-UV emission and fitted the spectra obtained from MUSE to determine the double peak fraction, asymmetry, full-width at half maximum, and flux of the Lyman αα line. The two surveys show different histograms of Lyman αα EW0_0. In MUSE-Wide, 20%20\% of objects have EW0>240_0 > 240 Å, while this fraction is only 11%11\% in MUSE-Deep and ≈16%\approx 16\% for the full sample. This includes objects without HST continuum counterparts (one-third of our sample), for which we give lower limits for EW0_0. The object with the highest securely measured EW0_0 has EW0=589±193_0=589 \pm 193 Å (the highest lower limit being EW0=4464_0=4464 Å). We investigate the connection between EW0_0 and Lyman αα spectral or UV continuum morphological properties. The survey depth has to be taken into account when studying EW0_0 distributions. We find that in general, high EW0_0 objects can have a wide range of spectral and UV morphological properties, which might reflect that the underlying causes for high EW0_0 values are equally varied. (abridged)

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.