Paper detail

Equivalence of light-front quantization and instant-time quantization

Commutation or anticommutation relations quantized at equal instant time and commutation or anticommutation relations quantized at equal light-front time not only cannot be transformed into each other, they take completely different forms. While they would thus appear to describe different theories, we show that this is not in fact the case. By looking not at equal times but at unequal times, we show that unequal instant-time commutation or anticommutation relations are completely equivalent to unequal light-front time commutation or anticommutation relations. Light-front quantization and instant-time quantization are thus the same, with it being only the restriction to equal times that makes them look different. However for fermions there is a caveat, as the light-front anticommutation relations involve projection operators acting on the fermion fields. Nonetheless, not only can one still derive fermion unequal light-front time anticommutators starting from unequal instant-time ones, one can even derive unequal instant-time fermion anticommutators starting from unequal light-front time anticommutators even though the fermion projection operators that are relevant in the light-front case are not invertible. To establish the equivalence for gauge fields we present a quantization procedure that does not involve zero-mode singularities that are commonly encountered in light-front gauge field studies. We also study time-ordered products of fields, and again show the equivalence despite the fact that there are additional terms in the fermion light-front case. We establish our results first for free theories, and then to all orders in interacting theories though comparison of the instant-time and light-front Lehmann representations. Finally, we compare instant-time Hamiltonians and light-front Hamiltonians, and show that in the instant-time rest frame they give identical results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.