Paper detail

EPPAC: Entity Pre-typing Relation Classification with Prompt AnswerCentralizing

Relation classification (RC) aims to predict the relationship between a pair of subject and object in a given context. Recently, prompt tuning approaches have achieved high performance in RC. However, existing prompt tuning approaches have the following issues: (1) numerous categories decrease RC performance; (2) manually designed prompts require intensive labor. To address these issues, a novel paradigm, Entity Pre-typing Relation Classification with Prompt Answer Centralizing(EPPAC) is proposed in this paper. The entity pre-tying in EPPAC is presented to address the first issue using a double-level framework that pre-types entities before RC and prompt answer centralizing is proposed to address the second issue. Extensive experiments show that our proposed EPPAC outperformed state-of-the-art approaches on TACRED and TACREV by 14.4% and 11.1%, respectively. The code is provided in the Supplementary Materials.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.