Paper detail

Epistocracy Algorithm: A Novel Hyper-heuristic Optimization Strategy for Solving Complex Optimization Problems

This paper proposes a novel evolutionary algorithm called Epistocracy which incorporates human socio-political behavior and intelligence to solve complex optimization problems. The inspiration of the Epistocracy algorithm originates from a political regime where educated people have more voting power than the uneducated or less educated. The algorithm is a self-adaptive, and multi-population optimizer in which the evolution process takes place in parallel for many populations led by a council of leaders. To avoid stagnation in poor local optima and to prevent a premature convergence, the algorithm employs multiple mechanisms such as dynamic and adaptive leadership based on gravitational force, dynamic population allocation and diversification, variance-based step-size determination, and regression-based leadership adjustment. The algorithm uses a stratified sampling method called Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) to distribute the initial population more evenly for exploration of the search space and exploitation of the accumulated knowledge. To investigate the performance and evaluate the reliability of the algorithm, we have used a set of multimodal benchmark functions, and then applied the algorithm to the MNIST dataset to further verify the accuracy, scalability, and robustness of the algorithm. Experimental results show that the Epistocracy algorithm outperforms the tested state-of-the-art evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms in terms of performance, precision, and convergence.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.