Paper detail

Envy-freeness and Relaxed Stability for Lower-Quotas : A Parameterized Perspective

We consider the problem of assigning agents to resources under the two-sided preference list model where resources specify an upper-quota and a lower-quota, that is, respectively the maximum and minimum number of agents that can be assigned to it. Different notions of optimality including envy-freeness and relaxed stability are investigated for this setting and the goal is to compute a largest optimal matching. Krishnaa et al. [SAGT 2020] show that in this setting, the problem of computing a maximum size envy-free matching (MAXEFM) or a maximum size relaxed stable matching (MAXRSM) is not approximable within a certain constant factor unless P = NP. This work is the first investigation of parameterized complexity of MAXEFM and MAXRSM. We show that MAXEFM is W [1]-hard and MAXRSM is para-NP-hard when parameterized on several natural parameters derived from the instance. We present kernelization results and FPT algorithms for both problems parameterized on other relevant parameters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.