Paper detail

Environmental variation compensated damage classification and localization in ultrasonic guided wave SHM using self-learnt features and Gaussian mixture models

Conventional damage localization algorithms used in ultrasonic guided wave-based structural health monitoring (GW-SHM) rely on physics-defined features of GW signals. In addition to requiring domain knowledge of the interaction of various GW modes with various types of damages, they also suffer from errors due to variations in environmental and operating conditions (EOCs) in practical use cases. While several machine learning tools have been reported for EOC compensation, they need to be custom-designed for each combination of damage and structure due to their dependence on physics-defined feature extraction. In this work, we propose a CNN-based automated feature extraction framework coupled with Gaussian mixture model (GMM) based EOC compensation and damage classification and localization method. Features learnt by the CNNs are used for damage classification and localization of damage by modeling the probability distribution of the features using GMMs. The Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence of these GMMs with respect to corresponding baseline GMMs are used as signal difference coefficients (SDCs) to compute damage indices (DIs) along various GW sensor paths, and thus for damage localization. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated using FE generated GW-data for an aluminum plate with a network of six lead zirconate titanate (PZT) sensors, for three different types of damages (rivet hole, added mass, notch) at various temperatures, with added white noise and pink noise to incorporate errors due to EOCs. We also present experimental validation of the method through characterization of notch damage in an aluminum panel under varying and non-uniform temperature profiles, using a portable custom-designed field programmable gate array (FPGA) based signal transduction and data acquisition system.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.