Paper detail

Enumeration schemes for vincular patterns

We extend the notion of an enumeration scheme developed by Zeilberger and Vatter to the case of vincular patterns (also called "generalized patterns" or "dashed patterns"). In particular we provide an algorithm which takes in as input a set $B$ of vincular patterns and search parameters and returns a recurrence (called a "scheme") to compute the number of permutations of length $n$ avoiding $B$ or confirmation that no such scheme exists within the search parameters. We also prove that if $B$ contains only consecutive patterns and patterns of the form $σ_1σ_2 ... σ_{t-1}-σ_t$, then such a scheme must exist and provide the relevant search parameters. The algorithms are implemented in Maple and we provide empirical data on the number of small pattern sets admitting schemes. We make several conjectures on Wilf-classification based on this data. We also outline how to refine schemes to compute the number of $B$-avoiding permutations of length $n$ with $k$ inversions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.