Paper detail

Enumeration of Maximal Cycles Generated by Orthogonal Cellular Automata

Cellular Automata (CA) are an interesting computational model for designing Pseudorandom Number Generators (PRNG), due to the complex dynamical behavior they can exhibit depending on the underlying local rule. Most of the CA-based PRNGs proposed in the literature, however, suffer from poor diffusion since a change in a single cell can propagate only within its neighborhood during a single time step. This might pose a problem especially when such PRNGs are used for cryptographic purposes. In this paper, we consider an alternative approach to generate pseudorandom sequences through \emph{orthogonal CA} (OCA), which guarantees a better amount of diffusion. After defining the related PRNG, we perform an empirical investigation of the maximal cycles in OCA pairs up to diameter $d=8$. Next, we focus on OCA induced by linear rules, giving a characterization of their cycle structure based on the rational canonical form of the associated Sylvester matrix. Finally, we devise an algorithm to enumerate all linear OCA pairs characterized by a single maximal cycle, and apply it up to diameter $d=16$ and $d=13$ for OCA respectively over the binary and ternary alphabets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.