Paper detail

Enumerating linear systems on graphs

The divisor theory of graphs views a finite connected graph $G$ as a discrete version of a Riemann surface. Divisors on $G$ are formal integral combinations of the vertices of $G$, and linear equivalence of divisors is determined by the discrete Laplacian operator for $G$. As in the case of Riemann surfaces, we are interested in the complete linear system $|D|$ of a divisor $D$---the collection of nonnegative divisors linearly equivalent to $D$. Unlike the case of Riemann surfaces, the complete linear system of a divisor on a graph is always finite. We compute generating functions encoding the sizes of all complete linear systems on $G$ and interpret our results in terms of polyhedra associated with divisors and in terms of the invariant theory of the (dual of the) Jacobian group of $G$. If $G$ is a cycle graph, our results lead to a bijection between complete linear systems and binary necklaces. The final section generalizes our results to a model based on integral $M$-matrices.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.