Paper detail

Entropy-Stable Schemes in the Low-Mach-Number Regime: Flux-Preconditioning, Entropy Breakdowns, and Entropy Transfers

Entropy-Stable (ES) schemes, specifically those built from [Tadmor \textit{Math. Comput.} 49 (1987) 91], have been gaining interest over the past decade, especially in the context of under-resolved simulations of compressible turbulent flows using high-order methods. These schemes are attractive because they can provide stability in a global and nonlinear sense (consistency with thermodynamics). However, fully realizing the potential of ES schemes requires a better grasp of their local behavior. Entropy-stability itself does not imply good local behavior [Gouasmi \textit{et al.} \textit{J. Sci. Comp.} 78 (2019) 971, Gouasmi \textit{et al.} \textit{Comput. Methd. Appl. M.} 363 (2020) 112912]. In this spirit, we studied ES schemes in problems where \textit{global stability is not the core issue}. In the present work, we consider the accuracy degradation issues typically encountered by upwind-type schemes in the low-Mach-number regime [Turkel \textit{Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.} 31 (1999) 285] and their treatment using \textit{Flux-Preconditioning} [Turkel \textit{J. Comput. Phys.} 72 (1987) 277, Miczek \textit{et al.} \textit{A \& A} 576 (2015) A50]. ES schemes suffer from the same issues and Flux-Preconditioning can improve their behavior without interfering with entropy-stability. This is first demonstrated analytically: using similarity and congruence transforms we were able to establish conditions for a preconditioned flux to be ES, and introduce the ES variants of the Miczek's and Turkel's preconditioned fluxes. This is then demonstrated numerically through first-order simulations of two simple test problems representative of the incompressible and acoustic limits, the Gresho Vortex and a right-moving acoustic wave. The results are overall consistent with previous studies [...]

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.