Paper detail

Entropy of Static Spacetimes and Microscopic Density of States

A general ansatz for gravitational entropy can be provided using the criterion that, any patch of area which acts as a horizon for a suitably defined accelerated observer, must have an entropy proportional to its area. After providing a brief justification for this ansatz, several consequences are derived: (i) In any static spacetime with a horizon and associated temperature $β^{-1}$, this entropy satisfies the relation $S=(1/2)βE$ where $E$ is the energy source for gravitational acceleration, obtained as an integral of $(T_{ab}-(1/2)Tg_{ab})u^au^b$. (ii) With this ansatz of $S$, the minimization of Einstein-Hilbert action is equivalent to minimizing the free energy $F$ with $βF=βU-S$ where $U$ is the integral of $T_{ab}u^au^b$. We discuss the conditions under which these results imply $S\propto E^2$ and/or $S\propto U^2$ thereby generalizing the results known for black holes. This approach links with several other known results, especially the holographic views of spacetime.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.