Paper detail

Entropy localization and extensivity in the semiclassical black hole evaporation

We aim to quantify the distribution of information in the Hawking radiation and inside the black hole in the semiclassical evaporation process. The structure quantum field theory forces to consider a shared information between two different regions of space-time. Using this tool, we show that the entropy of a thermal gas at the Unruh temperature underestimates the actual amount of (shared) information present in a region of the Rindler space. Then, we analyze the mutual information between the black hole and the late time radiation region. We show that in the semiclassical picture it is not possible to recover the eventual purity of the initial state in the final Hawking radiation through correlations established during the whole evaporation period, no matter the interactions present in the theory. We find extensivity of the entropy as a consequence of a reduction to a two dimensional conformal problem in a simple approximation. However, this seems not to be guaranteed in a full four dimensional calculation. We also find that a large amount of information is contained in a small approximately flat region of space-time near the point where the horizon begins. This gives place to large violations of the entropy bounds. This problem is not eased by backscattering effects and we argue that a breaking of conformal invariance is necessary to delocalize the entropy. Finally, we indicate that the mutual information could lead to a way to understand the Bekenstein-Hawking black hole entropy which does not require a reduction in degrees of freedom in order to regulate the entanglement entropy. On the contrary a large number of field degrees of freedom at high energies giving place to a Hagedorn transition implements a distance cutoff in the mutual information, which may in consequence turn out to be bounded.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.