Paper detail

Entropy and mixing for amenable group actions

For Γa countable amenable group consider those actions of Γas measure-preserving transformations of a standard probability space, written as {T_γ}_{γ\in Γ} acting on (X,{\cal F}, μ). We say {T_γ}_{γ\inΓ} has completely positive entropy (or simply cpe for short) if for any finite and nontrivial partition P of X the entropy h(T,P) is not zero. Our goal is to demonstrate what is well known for actions of \Bbb Z and even \Bbb Z^d, that actions of completely positive entropy have very strong mixing properties. Let S_i be a list of finite subsets of Γ. We say the S_i spread if any particular γ\neq id belongs to at most finitely many of the sets S_i S_i^{-1}. Theorem 0.1. For {T_γ}_{γ\in Γ} an action of Γof completely positive entropy and P any finite partition, for any sequence of finite sets S_i\subseteq Γwhich spread we have \frac 1{\# S_i} h(\spans{S_i}{P}){\mathop{\to}_i} h(P). The proof uses orbit equivalence theory in an essential way and represents the first significant application of these methods to classical entropy and mixing.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.