Paper detail

Entanglement detection under coherent noise: Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-like states

Entanglement is an essential resource in many quantum information tasks and entanglement witness is a widely used tool for its detection. In experiments the prepared state generally deviates from the target state due to some noise. Normally the white noise model is applied to quantifying such derivation and in the same time reveals the robustness of the witness. However, there may exist other kind of noise, in which the coherent noise can dramatically "rotate" the prepared state. In this way, the coherent noise is likely to lead to a failure of the detection, even though the underlying state is actually entangled. In this work, we propose an efficient entanglement detection protocol for $N$-partite Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ)-like states. The protocol can eliminate the effect of the coherent noise and in the same time feedback the corresponding noise parameters, which are beneficial to further improvements on the experiment system. In particular, we consider two experiment-relevant coherent noise models, one is from the unconscious phase accumulation on $N$ qubits, the other is from the rotation on the control qubit. The protocol effectively realizes a family of entanglement witnesses by postprocessing the measurement results from $N+2$ local measurement settings, which only adds one more setting than the original witness specialized for the GHZ state. Moreover, by considering the trade-off between the detection efficiency and the white-noise robustness, we further reduce the number of local measurements to 3 without altering the performance on the coherent noise. Our protocol can enhance the entanglement detection under coherent noises and act as a benchmark for the state-of-the-art quantum devices.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.