Paper detail

Entanglement and Causal Relation in distributed quantum computation

In this thesis, we investigate two different aspects of entanglement and classical communication in distributed quantum computation (DQC). In the first part, we analyze implementable computation over a given quantum network resource by introducing a new concept, quantum network coding for quantum computation. We consider a setting of networks where quantum communication for each edge of a network is restricted to sending one-qubit, but classical communication is unrestricted. Specifically, we analyze implementable $k$-qubit unitary operations over a certain class of networks, called cluster networks. We show that any two-qubit unitary operation is implementable over the butterfly network and the grail network, which are fundamental primitive networks for network coding. We also obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the probabilistic implementability of unitary operations over cluster networks. In the second part, we investigate resource tradeoffs in DQC. First, we show that entanglement required for local state discrimination can be substituted by less entanglement by increasing the rounds of classical communication. Second, we develop a new framework of deterministic joint quantum operations by using a causal relation between the outputs and inputs of the local operations without predefined causal order, called "classical communication" without predefined causal order (CC*). We show that local operations and CC* (LOCC*) is equivalent to the separable operation (SEP). This result indicates that entanglement-assisted LOCC implementing SEP can be simulated by LOCC* without entanglement. We also investigate the relationship between LOCC* and another formalism for deterministic joint quantum operations without assuming predefined causal order based on the quantum process formalism. As a result, we construct an example of non-LOCC SEP by using LOCC*.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.