Paper detail

Ensemble mean $\bf p_t$ vs charged-hadron multiplicities in high energy nuclear collisions

Measurements of event-ensemble mean transverse momentum $\langle p_t \rangle$ vs charged-hadron multiplicity $n_{ch}$ for $p_t$ spectra from 5 TeV p-Pb and 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions and from p-p collisions for several energies have been reported recently. While in all cases $\langle p_t \rangle$ increases monotonically with $n_{ch}$ the rate of increase is very different from system to system. Comparisons with several theory Monte Carlos reveal substantial disagreements and lead to considerable uncertainty on how to interpret the $\langle p_t \rangle$ data. In the present study we develop a two-component (soft+hard) model (TCM) of $p_t$ production in high energy nuclear collisions and apply it to the $\langle p_t \rangle$ data. The soft component is assumed to be a universal feature of high energy collisions independent of A-B system or energy. The hard-component model is based on the observation that dijet production in p-p collisions does not satisfy the eikonal approximation but does so in A-A collisions. Hard-component properties are determined from previous measurements of hadron spectrum hard components, jet spectra and fragmentation functions. The TCM describes the p-p and Pb-Pb $\langle p_t \rangle$ data accurately, within data uncertainties, and the p-Pb data appear to transition smoothly from p-p to A-A $n_{ch}$ trends.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.