Paper detail

Enigmatic Velocity Dispersions of Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies in Light of Modified Gravity Theories and Radial Acceleration Relation

Recent observations of anomalous line-of-sight velocity dispersions of two ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) provide a stringent test for modified gravity theories. While NGC 1052-DF2 exhibits an extremely low dispersion value ($σ\sim 7.8_{-2.2}^{+5.6}$ km/s), the reported dispersion value for NGC 1052-DF44 is quite high ($σ\sim 41.0 \pm 8$ km/s). For DF2, the dynamical mass is almost equal to the luminous mass suggesting the galaxy have little to no `dark matter' in $Λ$CDM whereas DF4 requires a dynamical mass-to-light ratio of $\sim 30$ making it to be almost entirely consists of dark matter. It has been claimed that both these galaxies, marking the extreme points in terms of the estimated dynamical mass-to-light ratio among known galaxies, would be difficult to explain in modified gravity scenarios. Extending the analysis presented in \cite{islam2019modified}, we explore the dynamics of DF2 and DF44 within the context of three popular alternative theories of gravity [Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), Weyl Conformal gravity and Modified gravity (MOG)] and examine their viability against the dispersion data of DF2 and DF44. We further show that the galactic `Radial Acceleration Relation' (RAR) is consistent with DF44 dispersion data but not with DF2.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.