Paper detail

Enhancing Smart Grid Information Exchanges: A Three-Phase Method for Evaluating Information and Data Models during their Development Process

The ongoing process of smart grid digitalisation is increasing the volume of automated information exchange across distributed energy systems. This has driven the development of new information and data models when existing models fail to offer an optimal description of the requisite information due to be exchanged. To prevent potential operational disruption - i.e. in the provision of flexibility - caused by flaws in these newly designed models, it is essential to conduct evaluations during the development process before these models are deployed. Current practices differ across domains. Beyond smart grid applications, information models are evaluated through explicit reviews using quality characteristics. Within smart grid contexts, evaluation focuses on data models and implicit system-level conformance and interoperability testing. However, no existing approach combines these explicit and implicit evaluation methods for both information and data models during their development. This limits early fault detection and increases potential model correction costs. To address this gap, we propose a three-phase evaluation method based on design science research. Our method integrates explicit and implicit approaches, applies them to information and data models and is adaptable to various design stages. We also introduce a set of quality characteristics to support explicit model evaluation. Overall, our contribution enhances the reliability and interoperability of smart grid information exchange.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.