Paper detail

Enhancing sampling in atomistic simulations of solid state materials for batteries: a focus on olivine NaFePO4

The study of ion transport in electrochemically active materials for energy storage systems requires simulations on quantum- atomistic- and mesoscales. The methods accessing these scales not only have to be effective but also well compatible to provide a full description of the underlying processes. We propose to adapt the Generalized Shadow Hybrid Monte Carlo (GSHMC) method to atomistic simulation of ion intercalation electrode materials for batteries. The method has never been applied to simulations in solid state chemistry but it has been successfully used for simulation of biological macromolecules, demonstrating better performance and accuracy than can be achieved with the popular molecular dynamics (MD) method. It has been also extended to simulations on meso-scales, making it even more attractive for simulation of battery materials. We combine GSHMC with the dynamical Core-Shell model to incorporate polarizability into the simulation and apply the new Modified Adaptive Integration Approach, MAIA, which allows for a larger time step due to its excellent conservation properties. Also, we modify the GSHMC method, without losing its performance and accuracy, to reduce the negative effect of introducing a shell mass within a dynamical shell model. The proposed approach has been tested on olivine NaFePO4, which is a promising cathode material for Na-ion batteries. The calculated Na-ion diffusion and structural properties have been compared with the available experimental data and with the results obtained using MD and the original GSHMC method. Based on these tests, we claim that the new technique is advantageous over MD and the conventional GSHMC and can be recommended for studies of other solid-state electrode and electrolyte materials whenever high accuracy and efficient sampling are critical for obtaining tractable simulation results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.