Paper detail

Enhancement of Br(B_d -> mu^+ mu^-)/Br(B_s -> mu^+ mu^-) in the MSSM with Modified Minimal Flavour Violation and Large tan(beta)

We extend our previous analysis of the decays B_{d,s} -> mu^+ mu^- in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) to include gluino and neutralino contributions. We provide analytic formulae, valid at large values of tan(beta), for the scalar and pseudoscalar Wilson coefficients arising from neutral Higgs boson exchange diagrams with gluinos and neutralinos. Together with the remaining contributions (W^{+/-}, H^{+/-}, charginos), and assuming the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix to be the only source of flavour violation, we assess their implications for the branching fractions Br(B_{d,s} -> mu^+ mu^-). Of particular interest is the quantity R = Br(B_d -> mu^+ mu^-)/Br(B_s -> mu^+ mu^-), since (i) the theoretical errors cancel to a large extent, and (ii) it offers a theoretically clean way of extracting the ratio |V_{td}/V_{ts}| in the Standard Model (SM), which predicts R_SM ~ |V_{td}/V_{ts}|^2 ~ O(10^{-2}). Exploring three different scenarios of modified minimal flavour violation, we find that part of the MSSM parameter space can accommodate large Br(B_{d,s} -> mu^+ mu^-) branching fractions, while being consistent with various experimental constraints. More importantly, we show that the ratio R can be as large as O(1), while the individual branching fractions may be amenable to detection by ongoing experiments. We conclude that within the MSSM with large tan(beta) the decay rates of B_{d} -> mu^+ mu^- and B_{s} -> mu^+ mu^- can be of comparable size even in the case where flavour violation is due solely to the CKM matrix.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.